Prince Harry, youngest son of King Charles III of the United Kingdom, has reappeared again in his homeland, leaving behind the United States and generating endless questions after the news that he has traveled without the presence of Meghan Markle. However, the answer to the former American actress’ absence is clearer and more justified than anything.
Today, the Duke of Sussex has surprisingly reappeared in the city of London, as he will be at the first hearing of the lawsuit that he and other personalities such as singer Elton John, have made against the Daily Mail newspaper for “serious breaches of privacy”.
However, there is something that has attracted a lot of attention, and that is that Prince Harry has traveled without the presence of his new wife, who usually accompanies him to every place he attends. This has generated endless questions, but the truth is that the absence of the Duchess is more than justified.
.
As many of us know, both Harry and Meghan have a deep conflict with the British royalty, generated based on the harsh accusations that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex made against some members of the royal family, alleging racist attacks, xenophobia and internal preferences within the crown.
After that, Meghan Markle has been the most affected by the continuous attack that the British media have made against her. For that reason, the former American actress could have taken the decision not to accompany her husband, who has also had to pay with a massive reduction of his popularity in British territory.
Some media had claimed that Prince Harry had left the United States after the accusations he has received from an American conservative organization, which has asked the government of that country to publish the visa application made by the youngest son of Lady Diana to be able to live in the greatest power in the world.
