Prince Harry and King Charles III’s father-son relationship has been a roller coaster. Several media outlets were claiming the relationship didn’t have a point of return because of the attacks from both parties during the last couple of years. In the light of new reports, Prince Harry was portrayed as a villain for trying to be the victim.
The Duke of Sussex’s latest visit to the United Kingdom had the intention of celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games. Ultimately, the Prince stayed at a hotel because he was allegedly rejected from being in one of the royal residences. However, new reports say otherwise.
It was confirmed that Prince Harry was offered to stay at royal residences like Clarence House, Buckingham Palace, or St. James Palace. However, he declined all of the offers because of security reasons. Jennie Bond, a royal expert told OK! Magazine that this argument is hard to buy. She even explained that the Prince was playing the victim once again.
“‘Poor me! I have nowhere to stay. My family won’t put me up. So I have to book into a hotel, even though I am a prince!’ I’m afraid it smacks of seeking sympathy.”
Jennie Bond, a royal expert needs to check her bias. It's clear she is in the anti Harry camp.
Harry has made it clear he has concerns about security on the UK.
The offer was only turned down due to the security issue.
Harry has gone to court over his concerns with his and his families security in the UK.
It's not a childish need for attention as Jennie is trying to spin it.
He and his family have had legitimate threats to their lives. Ppl arrested and charged with planning but also fueling hate towards them. Ppl felt so comfortable threating Harry's life Peirs morgan made vile graphic comments about harming/threat to Harry's life 2 times. one in print one on live TV!
There is the infamous clarkson article and then there is the online comments which an ex mi6 officer talked about.
It was always about Security.
Harry hasn't defamed the King.
Harry spoke out against the media's life long narrative for profit about him and his life. this includes his family relationships which in spare he shows have been impacted by the media actions and by his brothers and fathers comms teams actions(using Harry a child at the time to better his fathers PR)
Spare took aim squarely at the media and their actions far far more then at this family. the media was desperate for ppl to buy thier narratove that Harry was attacking anyone else built them.
I do find it funny how these royal experts who make a living of talking about the Royal family making wild guesses about their lives speculating about their thoughts feelings and what they MIGHT do...are the most upset and vocal whenever Harry comments or speaks about his own life experience (which inc his family).
Saying he a member of the Royal family shouldn't profit of the royal family(which he hasnt gave it to charity ect). The irony is lost on them I guess.